01
1. What the shape actually is
An inverted pyramid is a ranking, not a template. The reporter decides which single fact a reader would want if they read nothing else, writes that first, then repeats the judgement for the second paragraph, the third and so on until the material runs out. Nothing is held back for effect. There is no reveal, no build and no punchline, because the structure assumes a reader who may stop at any line and must not be misled by stopping early.
That assumption is the whole justification. A reader who abandons a feature after two paragraphs has missed the story. A reader who abandons a news item after two paragraphs should still know what happened, who says so and why it matters. If your draft fails that test, the shape has not been applied, whatever the layout looks like on the page.
02
2. Sizing and writing the lede
A news lede is one sentence carrying one idea, usually between twenty and thirty-five words. Longer than that and the sentence starts holding two ideas; shorter and it usually drops the consequence. The working order inside the sentence is what happened, to whom, where, and on whose authority, with time placed wherever it reads least awkwardly rather than at the front by habit.
The commonest fault is the throat-clearing lede, which announces a category before it delivers a fact: a meeting took place, a report was launched, concerns were raised. Categories are not news. Test each draft lede by asking what a reader now knows that they did not know before. If the answer is only that something exists, the real fact is still buried in paragraph four, which is where the lede should have come from.
03
3. The five questions and which one to drop
The five questions are a completeness check for the story, not a recipe for the first sentence. Answer them all somewhere in the first four paragraphs and then decide which two carry the news. In a story about a service closing, what and where usually lead. In a story about a decision, who and why usually lead. In a story about a figure that has moved, the number and its comparison lead, with the source immediately behind it.
How and why are the two most often mishandled, because they invite explanation before the facts are on the page. Keep the causal claim out of the lede unless a named source or a document states it. A reporter who writes that a closure happened because of demand has made an assertion; a reporter who writes that the operator attributed the closure to demand has reported one.
04
4. Where attribution belongs
In a hard news story, attribution appears in the first three paragraphs and usually in the first. Readers judge a claim partly by who is making it, and delaying that information asks them to trust the sentence on the newspaper's authority alone. Attribution can be compressed in the lede and expanded immediately after: a body is named in the first sentence, then the specific document, section, spokesperson role or meeting is identified in the second.
Two habits weaken attribution without technically removing it. The first is the floating passive, in which something is said to have happened with no agent named anywhere in the piece. The second is the plural shield, in which sources, critics or campaigners are cited collectively when only one person spoke. Both are correctable in a single pass: search the draft for every reporting verb and check that each one has an identified subject somewhere in the text.
05
5. Ordering the body by descending consequence
After the opening, each paragraph should be the most consequential of those remaining. Practically, this means listing the material you have as separate facts on one page, marking each one with the consequence it carries for the reader, then writing in that order. Chronology is not consequence: the fact that something happened first rarely makes it the second most important thing to know.
Two structural devices survive within the descending order. Background can be gathered into one paragraph placed after the third or fourth fact, so a reader who needs context finds it in one place. Reaction can be grouped, with the most directly affected party first and general comment last. Both work only if they stay short, because both are the paragraphs a sub-editor will cut when the page is tight.
06
6. Where the shape fails
The shape fails whenever the reader's question is not what happened but what it was like, how it unfolded, or what it means over time. A colour piece written as a pyramid reads as a list of details in descending brightness. A court story written entirely as a pyramid loses the sequence that makes evidence comprehensible, which is why running copy from a hearing is often chronological with a summary top.
The shape also fails when the most consequential fact is unresolved. If the central question is genuinely open, a pyramid forces a top line that pretends otherwise. The honest alternatives are an hourglass, which delivers the essential facts and then switches to chronology, or an explicit statement of the open question in the second paragraph. Narrative structure is examined at length in its own chapter, narrative structure.
07
7. Cutting from the bottom
The practical advantage of the shape is that it can be shortened without rewriting. A well-built pyramid survives being cut to six paragraphs, to four, and often to two, because nothing below depends on something below it. Test this yourself: delete the last third of a draft and read what remains. If a name is now unexplained, a figure has lost its comparison, or a right of reply has disappeared, the story was not built to be cut.
That test also catches a serious fairness problem. If a response from the person or body criticised sits in the last two paragraphs, any trim removes the balance of the piece. Responses belong high, immediately after the allegation they answer, so that shortening the story cannot make it one-sided by accident.
08
8. Checking the shape before you file
Read only the first sentence and ask whether it would stand alone in a list of headlines. Read only the first three paragraphs and ask whether a reader could repeat the story accurately to somebody else. Then read the whole piece backwards, paragraph by paragraph, checking that each one is less consequential than the one above it. Reading backwards is unnatural, which is exactly why it exposes ordering faults that forward reading smooths over.
Finally, count. A tightly built news item of four hundred words spends roughly twenty to forty of them on the lede, which is around five to ten per cent of the text. The story-structure meter in the news-writing lesson does that arithmetic and shows the reference band; it measures proportion only and cannot tell you whether the fact you chose was the right one.
Comparing news shapes
| Shape | Suits | Reader gets | Typical failure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inverted pyramid | Hard news, wire copy, briefs | The consequence in sentence one | Flattens sequence and atmosphere |
| Hourglass | Incidents with a sequence that matters | Key facts, then chronology | The turn is unmarked and the reader loses the thread |
| Chronological | Hearings, meetings, running events | Order of events as they happened | The significant moment arrives too late |
| Question and answer | Long single-source interviews | Voice and exact wording | No editorial judgement about what mattered |
Checklist before filing a hard news story
- One idea in the lede, between twenty and thirty-five words.
- Attribution present in the first three paragraphs, with a named body or identified role.
- Any response to criticism placed high, not in the final paragraph.
- Every paragraph less consequential than the one above it, checked by reading backwards.
- The story still accurate and fair when cut to its first four paragraphs.
- No causal claim in the lede that no source or document supports.
Questions readers ask
Is the inverted pyramid out of date?
No, but it is narrower than it used to be. It remains the default for hard news because readers leave early and sub-editors cut from the bottom. It is the wrong choice for features, colour and reconstruction, which need a different spine.
How long should a lede be?
One sentence carrying one idea, usually twenty to thirty-five words. The word count matters less than the single-idea rule: two ideas in one sentence is the fault, not length by itself.
Can I put the most interesting detail second instead of first?
Only if the most consequential fact is genuinely first. Interest and consequence are different measures, and a pyramid ranks consequence. If the interesting detail is what the story is really about, it was your lede all along.